Posted on May 10, 2017 by ADMIN

Could failed midfielder signing have changed Arsenal’s campaign?

Arsenal have endured a tiresome season which has left us with a huge uphill battle to try and make the top-four. Our completed signings of last summer have been blamed in some aspects, with arrivals Granit Xhaka, Lucas Perez and Shkodran Mustafi having all come under fire in contrasting ways during the campaign.

One midfielder we could have signed in the close-season has now revealed that he had the opportunity to join us, only for him to end up staying with Roma instead.

Radja Nainggolan said; “It was a choice of life. I like the lifestyle over here.

“There was Arsenal, but how you [Szczesny] talk always about them maybe I should have joined them.”

The comments are taken tongue in cheek, given Wojciech Szczesny’s frustrations with his lack of first-team football in recent years, but he clearly considered the switch, and he could have shored up one of our weakest positions this term.

Xhaka, Francis Coqueilin and Mohamed Elneny have failed to earn a regular starting role this term, with first-choice option Santi Cazorla having missed the majority of the season through injury. This failure has most likely been a strong reasoning behind our recent switch in tactics to give more stability to our defence.

Nainggolan’s 10 league goals would no doubt have helped us during the campaign, and his all-round game could well have kept us in the race for the title had he been in the squad to cover for the injuries and suspensions.

It’s unclear whether he had the chance to join the Swiss international in North-London, or if he would have been an alternative option, but he is much the more experienced than Granit, and could well have made the difference in our tough campaign.

Did our midfield problems cause the formation change? Would Nainggolan have been a better option than Xhaka?

Pat J

Share Button
Do you want send us an article for discussion?- click here


Loading...

5 thoughts on “Could failed midfielder signing have changed Arsenal’s campaign?

  1. Break-on-through

    Should have played Ramsey instead of Coquelin, and made the formation change sooner. Ramsey’s not top top, but when confident he is a threat despite not hitting the target himself, just being dangerous looking can unnerve teams and inspire you’re own side at same time. He links up well with our best ball players, he can be on the same page, even though it will not always come off for him. I don’t know why Arsene seemed to ignore him a while back especially how everyone says he’s the favorite. I think some of what the fans do say is beginning to get to Arsene. Also, Wilshere should have had a recall option. Then Wenger had the January window to try pull something off, it should have been looked into after seeing the extent of the Cazorla injury and then seeing our pedestrian looking play.

    Top Gooner!. Agree or not?: Thumb up 16 Thumb down 2

  2. Twig

    So what will be the situation with Wilshere next season? Keep or drop?

    Rate this comment: Thumb up 5 Thumb down 1

    1. Yossarian

      (a) He stays and doesn’t play due to injury.
      (b) Sell him and he won’t play due to being sold to another club.

      The only difference is that with option (b) Arsenal don’t pay his wages, and have a bit of extra cash in the transfer kitty. It’s a no-brainer.

      Rate this comment: Thumb up 11 Thumb down 1

  3. bran99

    I like this Radja Nainggolan guy, have watched some few games and he is really that defensive with high skills of interceptions and blocking opponents. good in every aspect. may be we should let some few average guys leave and get this guy, one hell of a defensive midfielder

    Rate this comment: Thumb up 10 Thumb down 0

    1. Martin

      Why would he sign for us now, he already had the chance to but decided to stay in Italy because he preferred the lifestyle there.

      Rate this comment: Thumb up 5 Thumb down 0

Comments are closed.