So, I thought I would be influenced by some of the talking points occurring on the site.
With no weekend fixture, I will carry on doing so.
I have noticed this week on JustArsenal the heaviest criticism Mikel Arteta has received since returning to the club. Even long-term readers who have defended his record over the last five years are suggesting whether he should start next season, fearing for his job.
What is more divisive is who should be accountable for failing to improve our attack in January.
One theory is that the Kroenke family backed him but didn’t want to trust him with any more funds last month. That would contradict making him the third highest-paid coach in the world (they managed to find money then). In most workplaces, if your boss is getting tired of your output, they don’t give you a pay rise.
Let’s, though, explore how much our manager has been backed and what his success rate is.
These are ranked from worst to best.
(I love to know yours, peeps.)
Willian – Free Transfer
How high this ranks depends on how much you consider that at least we didn’t pay a fee for the Brazilian.
He was, however, earning £240,000 a week in North London. He earned some respect from Gooners by not fighting against having his contract ripped up after one season, essentially walking away from guaranteed money in the region of £20 million.
It meant he never got to play in front of our fans.
Did the pandemic impact him? Or did he struggle in our youthful dressing room compared to the standards set at Chelsea?
Given he got 11 goals in his final year at the Bridge and the form he has shown at Fulham, there are reasons we are not aware of as to why it didn’t work out at the Emirates.
Lokonga – £17.2 Million
This is just looking like a mistake.
Loan moves for the Belgian were designed for his development, but at Palace and Luton, he did little to prove his doubters wrong.
The problem with a lot of players Arteta washes his hands of is that they are on such high wages it’s a struggle to find anyone willing to pay a fee.
Hence why Sevilla have been happy to borrow him but not with any obligation to buy.
It will stay that way until his contract expires.
Tavares – £8 Million
With Lazio’s obligation to buy, the Gunners could break even on the left-back, but Tavares’ experience in North London is an example of Arteta’s poor man management once he gives up on a player.
Our manager subbed the Portuguese after just 35 minutes in an FA Cup tie and at half-time in the Premier League. Meanwhile, on Amazon’s All or Nothing documentary, he wasn’t shy about singling out the defender.
The 25-year-old clearly doesn’t agree with his treatment, insisting on his last two loans having a guaranteed transfer as part of the deal.
Given how he has performed in Serie A, we have lost out on serious money because of this friction between player and boss.
Alex Rúnarsson – £2 Million
If you’re a young keeper who was only meant to be backup and played only six times as a Gunner, things have to go pretty wrong for you to be near the top of this list.
He was so evidently out of his depth in a League Cup tie against Man City that all parties immediately accepted he wasn’t ready for this level.
After loans to Belgium, Turkey and Wales, he agreed to have his contract ripped up.
Trusty – £1.8 Million
Low on the list simply because paying any amount for a player who doesn’t play a second for you is not ideal.
To be fair to our manager, this is one of those signings a club makes with the long term in mind.
The American was immediately loaned back to Colorado Rapids and then sent to Birmingham to get him used to the physical nature of English football.
He couldn’t have done much more to impress in the Championship, voted the club’s player of the season.
Did the left-back run out of patience, or was he simply not quite good enough?
Relegated with Sheffield United might give you the answer, with Arsenal making a profit by getting £5 million. Now at Celtic.
Marquinhos – £3.5 Million
Gooners originally got excited when we signed the 19-year-old Brazilian with a massive reputation in his homeland. As a teenager, he was voted for the prestigious Golden Boy award.
He scored and assisted in his Europa League debut.
Yet loans at Norwich and Nantes have left a question mark over whether he’s ready for European football, hence why he’s back in South America for the short term.
Only 21, though, so let’s not give up on him yet.
Vieira – £35 Million
I’ve always felt our manager has got away with just how bad this piece of business has been.
Imagine giving Porto £35 million just to give him back for nothing two seasons later.
At 24, it could just be a case of too much too soon in terms of not being ready for the physicality of the English game. Yet he’s hardly pulling up any trees back in Portugal.
Arteta talks like the loan is part of the player’s development.
Why don’t I believe him?
Raheem Sterling – Loan
While no one at our club will publicly admit it, Sterling was simply a cheap option in the last few hours of August’s deadline day—a chance to bring in a body without paying a fee.
With Chelsea covering most of the player’s wages, it’s a risk-free loan.
Yet our manager clearly quickly identified the reasons Enzo Maresca didn’t want to register the winger in any of his squads. At 30, only the man himself knows those reasons, but even in games where we needed a goal, our manager has left him on the bench.
When our boss was Pep Guardiola’s assistant at Man City, his ability to get the best out of talent in one-on-one situations was praised, with Sterling often cited as an example. So the two had a decent relationship at the Etihad.
Injuries mean there is still a platform for Sterling to prove people wrong, which would be a great story.
The reality is, though, it’s been a few years now since his best form.
Neto – Loan
Some get too worked up about this, not understanding why we would loan someone knowing they were cup-tied for the Carabao Cup.
I simply look at it as a case of needing a backup keeper in case anything happens to Raya, and there was a chance to bring in an experienced goalie without paying a fee.
All parties benefit. If you’re going to be number two at the Vitality, why not do the same at the Emirates?
The Brazilian is smart enough to know too many starts were unlikely.
Yet if the worst were to happen and our current number one got sidelined, I trust the 35-year-old to come in and do a job.
He didn’t exactly show that on his debut, but I’m glad he played so he feels part of the team.

Matt Ryan – Loan
Very similar to Neto, a chance to bring in a number two keeper who had ready-made experience in the division.
Played three times for us, keeping one clean sheet.
Matt Turner – £6 Million
Played seven times for us as our cup keeper but never in the Prem.
Given what he would do in-between on the international stage, he was too good to be an understudy at his age—although he has yet to prove that at Forest or Palace.
His best performances have been for the USA.
Mari – Loan / £10 Million
The Gunners went through a few Januarys where the policy was not to make permanent signings (some things change yet stay the same). This was a deal that existed because it was a way to bring in a body without having to pay a fee until the summer.
In general, his stay in North London was not offensive. He was a solid squad player whom you could rely on. Arsenal got into a bad habit of loaning out players while their contracts ran down. The defender was loaned to Serie A for two years before Monza triggered a release clause, essentially meaning we broke even on the Spaniard.
Merino – £32 Million
Maybe too early to judge.
History tells us some players need a season to get used to a new culture and the physical nature of English football, so he deserves the benefit of the doubt.
For the amount of money we paid, though, it could have been better spent elsewhere. He hasn’t been trusted to have a run in the team, and I’m still not sure what his strengths are.
His best contribution as a Gunner was his cameo at Leicester as a makeshift striker, which sadly tells you a lot.
Kiwior – £19 Million
Too early to judge the 25-year-old, but there have been mixed messages so far from his boss.
At times, if Saliba or Gabriel had been injured, our manager chose to play Partey right back and Timber in the middle instead of trusting Kiwior.
Some Gooners act like he’s an academy graduate and not someone who cost us nearly £20 million. That’s because it’s obvious Arteta doesn’t have faith in him.
Many Italian clubs do, though, so watch this space.
Cedric – Loan / Free
He was originally signed on loan while his contract expired, but that felt more like a chance to bring a body in without paying a fee rather than anyone truly rating him.
Put it this way: would we have been interested had we had to pay any serious money?
Defensively, though, he could be trusted and was a decent crosser of the ball, a quality we didn’t exploit enough.
We eventually loaned him out to get him off the wage bill, while he spent his final year in North London knowing, if his employers had their way, he’d be elsewhere. Our manager, though, trusted the Portuguese enough to still include him in squads, something he didn’t do for other talent he phased out.
Calafiori – £42 Million
Injuries have meant he’s yet to manage a run of starts as a Gunner.
If all defenders were fit, I think long term he would be competing for the centre-back role instead of a makeshift left-back. We seem to be copying, at times, the Man City model of having centre-backs across the entire back four.
The Italian may have shocked some with his skill set. While he has a growing reputation in his homeland of being able to pass out from the back and start attacks, he seems to love carrying the ball and getting forward. This shows he has personality.
A section of our fanbase seems frustrated that more money was spent on a defender, but that’s not the 22-year-old’s fault.
Timber – £34 Million
Harsh to rank him because a horrible injury means this essentially has been his debut season in English football. That’s literally the only reason I can’t put him higher on this list.
He’s done little wrong, though. You can trust him defensively, he has the tactical brain to know when to step into midfield, and doesn’t mind a physical battle.
He doesn’t get forward as much as I would like, but I assume that’s more his manager’s choice?
Because of his injury, Arteta probably wanted to manage his minutes this season, cautious if he could start every few days. He’s probably played more than he should have, though, which is a credit to the Dutchman.
Ramsdale – £28 Million
I still maintain I never felt Ramsdale did enough wrong to be dropped, especially when other areas of the team needed strengthening.
It seemed harsh that, having played such a massive part in helping the club return to the Champions League, he got to play in the competition just once.
According to his dad, Arteta never bothered to explain what the keeper did wrong or what areas he could work on to improve (probably didn’t help his son’s cause?).
The Kroenke family would have every right to know why Edu was authorising a pay rise for the goalie to then, a few months later, want another £32 million spent on the role.
This is what happens when you let a manager think it’s standard practice to just give up on a talent.
As a former player himself, the Spaniard must have known that goalkeeper is a position many don’t reach their peak until after the age of 30.
So if you’re spending £28 million on a goalie in his early twenties, surely you accept he’s learning on the job and a few mistakes are going to happen?
Havertz – £65 Million
Let me clarify, he’s only this low on the list because of the transfer fee and wages he earns.
He divides opinions among Gooners, but few would say he’s not a good footballer; he’s simply not a natural goalscorer.
He reminds me of the grief Giroud used to receive in the sense that it’s not his fault Arsenal chose not to bring in a proper striker to support him.
Originally, the plan seemed to be for the German to be a number 10 next to Odegaard, but when that didn’t work, he was moved up front. The issue being that if you’re one of the highest-paid players in our history, you should be the difference-maker, not someone whose manager can’t find his best position.
There were years of evidence at the Bridge that Havertz was never going to get you 15-20 league goals a season.
Not sure how that wage was justified.
Tomiyasu – £18 Million
When fit, he has been outstanding. The key word, though, is when.
Often, Mikel Arteta is vague about the true nature of the defender’s injuries and plays down the length of time he will be unavailable.
It is, unfortunately, reaching the point where you question whether he ever be able to stay fit. This is a shame because, as someone who can play anywhere across the back four, we are missing him.
Zinchenko – £30 Million
Another player which sums up Arteta’s terrible habit of giving up on players the moment he feels they no longer suit his ethos.
Our manager sees our players daily in training, so he might have his reasons, but it’s a long list of names he’s just washed his hands of.
Originally, he loved Zinchenko. Copying Pep Guardiola, our tactics were to have our left-back plan when to step into midfield. As time progressed, though, this was no longer catching opponents by surprise.
This season, it’s been clear that the Ukrainian is no longer trusted defensively, with him behind Tierney in the pecking order if we are protecting a lead.
Surely, the third-highest paid coach in the world should be teaching the player on the training pitch how to improve? That’s got to be part of the job description?
Not leaving a £30 million asset on the bench. With our lack of attacking options, I would be using him more.
Jorginho – £11 Million
Given that Caicedo had asked Brighton not to price him out of a move to Arsenal when we ended up with Jorginho that January, it seemed like an anticlimax.
Yet, he has given a young dressing room much-needed experience. I wouldn’t have had a problem if the Italian played more, as especially against top-level teams, I trust him next to Rice more than anyone else.
Off the pitch, the 33-year-old is such a leader and has so much tactical understanding he’s being predicted to be a future manager.
It seems he’s heading to Brazil in the summer. Anyone else think he should have been offered a contract extension?
Trossard – £24 Million
Like Jorginho, Trossard originally seemed like an anticlimax when Edu had told us he had agreed a deal with Mudryk.
Very quickly, it was apparent we found serious value.
If we had got over the line last year, his contribution in the run-in would have been more celebrated.
Perhaps one of the best finishers at the club, although debates remain: is he better as an impact player off the bench?
Lacks the mentality to take responsibility and be the main man but a decent squad player.
Jesus – £45 Million
Started life in North London on fire. While not a natural goalscorer, the one attacker at times not afraid to at least try and do something different, taking on his man, altering position, always harassing defenders. Even when having a goal drought, you feel the Brazilian can do something unpredictable with his quick feet.
Our current front three greatly miss him.
Unfortunately, he is experiencing his second long-term ACL injury. Combined with niggling knee problems, the 27-year-old might have to accept that while his mind is willing, his body might not be anymore.
He’s in danger of his legacy as a Gunner being unlucky with his health.
Cruelly, it seemed he had finally refound his confidence after his last spell on the sidelines. Mentally, as much as physically, this must be an ordeal.
I don’t think he will ever replicate his Man City form.
Partey – £45 Million
Of course, you can’t blame a player if he’s injury-prone, but the midfielder has had too many fitness issues to justify £45 million being considered well-spent.
It feels like every season since he moved to North London, he has a spell on the sidelines, meaning he’s not reliable.
The irony is that the one campaign he’s stayed largely healthy could be his last year at the Emirates.
At the age of 31, not trusted to play every few days, I can understand why his employers can’t defend continuing to pay him his current wage.
Raya – Loan / £27 Million
Initially, Raya divided opinion among the fanbase. Not because the Spaniard had done anything wrong, but did Ramsdale do so terribly that so much money needed to be invested in a position when other areas of the team needed strengthening?
Since being made a permanent Gunner, though, the keeper couldn’t have done more to impress. The test of a decent goalie is their concentration level. Can they spend the majority of 90 minutes with nothing to do but deliver when called upon?
He’s produced some of the saves of the season.
Odegaard – Original Loan / £30 Million
Since moving to England, he has realised the potential many predicted he had, which prompted Real Madrid to buy him as a teenager.
Not the most vocal, initially seemed an odd choice for captain but clearly leads by example.
The last two title challenges have coincided with his best form. Although comparisons with KDB are silly.
At times this campaign, he has been guilty of taking too many touches and overthinking his finishing, not helped by being our sole creative outlet. Wouldn’t shock me if he’s not fully fit after injury. He will find his confidence at some point.
For his price, though, incredible value.
I sense some Gooners are turning on him, which seems harsh?
Rice – £105 Million
Even when not playing well, I love his effort.
He was poor at the weekend, but recently I felt he was looking back to his old self, even trying to take responsibility by making more runs into the box to try and solve our attacking limitations.
For a while, it’s been predicted that the more the 26-year-old develops, he will become an all-round midfielder who adds goals to his game.
Part of the problem is he’s great at so many things that it seems Arteta can’t decide what role he wants Rice to play.
Set-piece delivery: world-class.
A DM or box-to-box midfielder?
A future Arsenal captain?
Ben White – £50 Million
For a while, I felt Ben White didn’t get enough credit, including from our fanbase.
Ironically, that changed just as he was announcing he didn’t want to represent England for the foreseeable future. Something tells me that will change now with the country having a new coaching staff.
White has such a great footballing brain. He’ll start at right-back but knows when to form a back three, step into midfield, or overlap on the wing.
We’ve greatly missed his understanding with Saka, with White seemingly trusted more by Arteta to attack than other full-backs.
In a young dressing room where I still question the mentality, White is a leader who takes responsibility.
Gabriel – £26 Million
It’s easy to forget that there’s still a lot to like about our squad. That’s why so many Gooners are hurt, because they sense this young team is not far away from winning things but has let the moment pass us by.
Defensively, though, we are one of the best in England – something I never thought I’d say about the Gunners.
During the majority of Arsène Wenger’s reign, we didn’t score many goals from set pieces either.
Gabriel is a big part of us improving in both areas.
I’ve always rated the 27-year-old but felt he had a mistake in him. This season, though, he’s really developed leadership skills. While Saliba gets the most headlines, it’s actually the Brazilian who is the vocal one, ordering his peers where to be and organising the entire back four.
It’s refreshing to see a centre-back who loves to defend, at times celebrating a block like it’s a goal.
Good list. Many of the “flops”, haven’t cost us a fortune. We even made small profits from Trusty, Turner and Tavares, although Tavares is now 3x worth what we are getting.
Neto, Sterling, Willian.. bad signings but eventually got/will get rid. Vieira is doing decent now for Porto.
I think buying Havertz for that fee and current wages and NOT selling Jesus last summer when Palmeiras offered £33 million for him, were the worst mistakes.
Jesus is a known injury-prone player so I don’t see how MA could publicly state “who could see his knee injury coming”, as it was evident from his injury record (4 knee injuries before the current one, missing total of 25 matches).
Hits – Gabby M, White, Odegard
Misses – all the rest
Raya – is he an upgrade on Martinez – for me – no.
Special mention – Rice @105M , delivered the conference cup for WHU fans, could not give us the Carabao Cup!
Thanks Dan for a nice article based on facts, now you know why Mikel should not be trusted with 1 GBP for transfers.
While you are of course entitled to your views, your knowledge of the game seems to be somewhat lacking if you consider Rice and Timber to be “misses”
Sir, please educate me with their contributions towards wining silverware. I judge players on their contributions. After paying millions, yet the team relies on Saka’s brilliance, I need not say more.
Don’t think Gabby M, White or Odegard have contributed towards winning much silverware either.
But they can be sold for a profit, and yes all 3 will certainly move if things do not change for the good. Add Saliba and Saka to the list and we could be challenging for the “Top 17th spot Trophy” in the coming seasons.
I know he’s having a rough time right now, but as soon as Ødegaard gets White & Saka back things will pick up, and at that price he’s my number one. Runarsson is among the worst keepers ever at Arsenal (and I’ve seen McKechnie & McClelland), so he’s my last choice.
6 keepers signed and talk of another in the summer .
7 full backs .
That’s 13 out of the 30 players signed to take 3 spots
Not one striker in 5 years
Dan Kit,
Maybe Arteta is looking for a striker that can also play at left back. We all know Arteta likes a left back don’t we, and playing square pegs in round holes. 😂😉👍
– Not seen William Saliba in the list. Or did I miss something?
– I think Fabio Vieira may yet turn out to be a success at Arsenal. Been watching his games at Porto
Saliba was signed before MA arrived I think.
Partey too?
You missed something
Tavares wasn’t a flop – he has been brilliant for Arsenal and everywhere he’s been loaned out to! This was simply down to Arteta’s preference. I think it is expected to have a few poor performances when making the jump from Benfica reserves to starting for Arsenal, and I don’t think a few bad moments should define an otherwise impressive player who has proven his worth at Marseille and Lazio. Not to mention, his price has tripled. If anything, this was an Arteta flop, not the player. He will be on the plane to the 2026 World Cup with Portugal.
Why Kiwior isn’t near the top of this list, I have no idea. He has crumbled in some of our biggest games (Bayern) and I believe he will never reach the Arsenal standard. His experiment at left back was a disaster, and he is able to survive at CB next to the quality of Saliba or Gabriel. I fear for our defense anytime he is near the 11.
It’s nice to see Vieira getting solid minutes back at his hometown club, but isn’t that the bare minimum after buying him for 35 million? Arteta insisted on giving him chance after chance over ESR until he finally had to admit his mistake. Another massive flop, sadly, but hopefully the confidence he gains being back in his comfort zone will stick.
Are you high? Tarvares was awful for us, awful for Forrest and awful for Marseille. He started well at Lazio now hes back on the bench.
I am not sure where you are getting your info, maybe Instagram? I watch the French league, and he was fantastic. How do you think he keeps getting moves to good clubs? LOL he starts for Lazio by the way– google is free!
Laziali.com: “The Portuguese was in sensational form during the first half of Thursday’s Europa League contest. He instigated the second goal and provided a sublime assist for the third, but was forced to leave the pitch shortly afterwards after suffering a muscle problem.”
His value way above what Arsenal paid for him… how does that happen Mr. Sober?
You’re just a hater!
Was goer say the same thing 😂
Liam being Liam .
Valued at 60 million now not sure where your getting your info from buddy 😂
By the president of the club that owns him. Of course he’s going to big up his player. He have agreed to sell him for 8 million if he was that good in France surely Marseille would pay that 8 million?
But mate
If your doing well elsewhere that can’t be a success at Arsenal can it ?
Not saying his fault but his time at Arsenal can’t be seen as a success
Tavares did have a few games right at the start for us when he looked brilliant, but soon after he got exposed defensively and never got going again. I think he has a lot of talent and is physically outstanding, but his attitude is poor
The list of Arteta’s signings and their relative success or failure show some kind of trend.
The expensive signings have nearly all been successful apart from Vieira who i expect was maybe regarded as more of a risk considering his limited playtime at the time of his signing and slight body frame. That being said in recent years 35m is hardly an expensive signing if you consider the transfer inflation. Lower mid table teams are making bigger transfer and washing their hands of talents when they fail.
Most of the failed transfers are low fees, loans or free transfers. These transfers are mostly gambles that all big clubs do and they mostly fail. E.g Lokonga was one a young promising player in a belgian league bought mainly on potential. He didn’t progress to the required level but most of these signings never do.
I’d say He did really well compared to the other Big 6 clubs. Keita, Nunez, Nunes, Grealish, Philips.
His biggest failure is not pivoting to a bkup option once it was clear Sesko wouldn’t move last season. Clearly we rated Watkins so why didn’t we go for him or someone else. Always found it very strange considering we did it very well i might say when Mudryk and Caicedo transfer went bad. Why we were never in for Evan Ferguson, Rashford, Asensio or Malen. Sure we could have negociated with Bournemouth to buy Neto to open up a space for a domestic loan.
Lokonga is on loan with an option to buy at Seville plus +-25% sell on if the option is taken and there’s still 18 months remaining on his contract. Apart from some injuries he’s been doing really well there and there’s big chances that it could be permanent. At Luton last season he did very well, but injuries have been hampering his progress.
For the reasons above, I don’t think he deserves to be that low on your rankings @Dan
My issue with mate is while he might have talent is doing well somewhere else a good transfer for us
So when we got him a few years ago if I said in a couple of years he is going to be doing well just not with us is that a good transfer ?
Well I hear you @Dan, but my disagreement was with the ranking and also you saying, I qoute “It will stay that way until his contract expires.” It sounds like you’re suggesting that he will definitely leave for free. I believe Lokonga is not short of admires, if you recall David Ornstein did say during the summer window Fiorentina were willing to offer more but Lokonga insisted on joining Seville.
No mate the opposite in many ways
I’m saying clubs know he won’t play for Arsenal so let’s say Arsenal say give us 10 million a club will say …..
We can pay a fee or loan him and we know Arsenal will accept that loan because there only choice will.be to pay him to sit at home
I can’t see how you can rank him high
17 million to be good somewhere else ?
The other perspective you are not stating is that if he does well at Seville and that could ignite some more interest in him from other clubs.
All am saying is it can’t be that bad if we recoup some of the funds.
Well no because he’s a success not at Arsenal
If he wins La Liga with Seville you wouldn’t say he’s done great for Arsenal would you
Watch in the summer
When we buy someone I bet you won’t say ‘ I hope in 3 years he’s done good on loan ‘ ?
While I won’t argue with what you’ve written, I completely disagree on Partey.
First, he wasn’t injury prone when at Athletico Madrid so there was no way we would have known. Remember Hazard’s move to Madrid?
Secondly, you seem not to rate his contribution except for 2 seasons ago. It’s not easy to pick up after an injury and I believe it’s a testament to his quality that he hasn’t fallen off a cliff with all those injuries. He’s far better than you seem to give him credit for
Who would you have rated him above ?
Not like I put him bottom of the list
Just counted
There are 30 players
I put him at 6 lol
How have you translated that as bad ?
Interesting article Dan
Mari or Cedric were inoffensive but they were loans that turned into signings under Sanhelli’s tenure who I believe had a close relationship with their agents. Did this negatively affect future transfers?
I felt so sorry for Runarrson who was completely out of his depth
It’s the higher transfers in terms of fees paid that needs closer consideration. Whilst Vieira occasionally scored a cracking goal his lack of physical presence was disappointing so it’s a 👎from me
Both Jesus and Zinchenko gave a boost at the time of their arrival. Jesus was looking better recently in return from injury but moderate for both
I really rate White. Whether it was his dodgy fitness that saw him benched in favour of Timber I don’t know. A definite plus to me.
Mostly from the list the poor signings speak for themselves
Yeah I love White
Him and Rice future captains ?
Dan,
White Rice yum yum. 😂🤣👍
Yeah I love White
Him and Rice future captains ?
Nice overview – not much I could say I disagree with, Dan. Rice, white and Gabriel makes sense as a top 3 and I agree Gabriel has been the best signing arteta’s made all things considered.
Great piece Dan. Califiori was expensive. Looks a yard too slow, like a guy who’s had a few leg injuries. Not great in his core role. Will have to give away fouls at times. Seen that already.