Kai Havertz has remained an important player for Arsenal in recent seasons, with the German continuing to earn the trust of Mikel Arteta in both midfield and attacking roles.
The Gunners have worked hard to maximise the quality within their squad, aiming to get the best from every player available. However, as with any top side, not every individual delivers consistently when the team needs strong performances most.
Arteta’s role involves improving players and helping them perform at their highest level, yet even the Arsenal manager faces challenges in extracting form from certain members of his squad.
Questions Raised Over Havertz
One player who has recently come under scrutiny is Havertz, despite many supporters viewing him as one of the more dependable figures in the team.
The German international has faced fitness struggles at times, which have affected continuity. Even so, criticism has now focused on whether he consistently produces in the biggest matches.
As reported by Football Insider, analyst Mick Brown said, “There have been concerns about Kai Havertz for a while.”
He continued: “You never get the feeling he’s going to do it in big games. He might perform against lesser opposition, but when it comes to the big games, he has got to stand up.”
Collective Responsibility At Arsenal
While individual criticism is common in football, results are rarely determined by one player alone. Arsenal’s performances, whether strong or disappointing, are ultimately the responsibility of the entire team.
Success at the highest level depends on collective quality, tactical organisation and players delivering together in key moments. Even the most talented individuals need support from those around them.
For that reason, placing too much focus on one player can overlook broader issues that may affect a side’s form.
Havertz remains a versatile option for Arteta and has shown his value in different positions. His movement, work rate and technical qualities continue to make him a useful member of the squad.
Arsenal will hope all of their key players, including Havertz, can find top form during the most important part of the season. If they are to meet their ambitions, strong displays across the whole squad will be required rather than relying on any single individual.
So this is harsh.
He is coming back from injury , plus we played bettwr with him. He is intelligent, makes good runs, links up play unlike gyokeres who offers nothing unless the opponents dont mark him and he has loads of space.
Mick brown chats a lot of crap every week, why isnt he employed by someone if he is so good at his job
No need to be hard on Mick. I too believe Kai Havertz is no good. Period.
Against bigger teams the analyst gets the feeling that Havertz isn’t going to step up. Having gone a goal down against City he showed up sufficiently to embarrass Donnarumma. Ad above is right imo that Arsenal do play better with him.
When he plays up front in the no. 9 role he plays very well, but when played in midfield or behind the striker he offers very little next to nothing. In other to get the best out of him put him in the CF position . My biggest issue with him is the way he always easily goes to ground with the slightest of touch from the opponent , he easily goes to the ground looking/ begging for a pen or a free kick. There was a moment in our game against city where he was through on goal but had only little bernado Silva beside him as his only marker, one would expect the bigger havertz to bump Silva aside and be 1v1 with donarima, nay, it was the little bernado that body checked havertz tripping him and winning the ball. Then Thiers that Khusanov coming together and havertz going to ground looking for a pen. Any big striker would have won that duel with Khusanov.
But all in all, I prefer him playing in CF above Gyokeres.
While he will never be a top notch striker,imo he is the best option we have available notwithstanding the hard working Gyokeres and the skilful Jesus.The fact that our Manager has apparently never considered using Martinelli through the middle has disappointed me as he could well prove to be effective as a central striker.