Arsenal drops to 8th in Forbes rich list

There has been an upheaval in revenue for most rich football clubs after having to cope without match-day revenue for over a year, but the TV and sponsorship money keeps rolling in, so the values of clubs in total have still been increasing year on year.

For instance, Liverpool’s value has increaed by a massive 80% in the last two years, compared to Man City’s 49% uplift. Even Arsenal’s value has risen by a miserly 23% since 2019, but you can imagine that if the Gunners fail to qualify for Europe for the first time in 25 years, they could see Moneybags Paris St Germain creep up on them by the time of the next Forbes valuation. In the last two years the French giants value has risen by a massive 129%.

You would think that values may have fallen through the Covid pandemic, and as we have seen by the experiences of telecomasia.net, perhaps many clubs will suffer from the lack of paying customers as the loss of matchday revenue is certain to play havoc with clubs finances, but sponsorship deals are still on the increase, especially when backed by oil-rich countries.

Right behind PSG in 10th are our noisy rivals Tottenham Hotspurs, whose value has increased 43% so could also start closing in on the Gunners.

Barcelona have knocked Real Madrid off the top for the very first time, but only just. Barca’s value is $4.76B compared to Madrid’s $4.75B, so the difference is minimal to say the least.

Bayern Munich have also edged above Manchester United for third place, but again the gap is minimal with both Liverpool and Man City right behind them, these places could change significantly in two years.

But the Premier League dominates the Top Ten with six teams, despite the first two being from La Liga. The EPL also have Everton in 15th, West Ham in 18th and Leicester in 19th. It is no surprise that those last three named are competing for the Champions League places right now, which could increase their value exponentially as earning and sponsorship revenue grow with success.

On the other hand, Arsenal’s $2.04B valuation may be music to Stan Kroenke’s ears, but unless the club starts to invest in line with our rivals then our earnings will stagnate while some so-called “smaller teams” like Everton and West Ham will get a massive boost in value if they can start to consistently challenge for European places every season.

Looking at these figures it looks like Mikel Arteta has his work cut out just to keep pace with our rivals, never mind challenge for the title. A few years without European football could see us drop further down the rich list year on year.

Here’s the full list below, according to Forbes.

1. Barcelona – $4.76billion (£3.46bn)

2. Real Madrid – $4.75billion (£3.46bn)

3. Bayern Munich – $4.22billion (£3.07bn)

4. Manchester United – $4.2billion (£3.06bn)

5. Liverpool – $4.1billion (£2.98bn)

6. Manchester City – $4billion (£2.91bn)

7. Chelsea – $3.2billion (£2.33bn)

8. Arsenal – $2.8billion (£2.04bn)

9. Paris Saint-Germain – $2.5billion (£1.82bn)

10. Tottenham Hotspur – $2.3billion (£1.67bn)

Tags Forbes Kroenke rich-list

4 Comments

  1. Sean M says:

    “On the other hand, Arsenal’s $2.04B valuation may be music to Stan Kroenke’s ears, but unless the club starts to invest in line with our rivals then our earnings will stagnate while some so-called “smaller teams” like Everton and West Ham will get a massive boost in value if they can start to consistently challenge for European places every season.”

    Seems like a contradiction to me. “Smaller teams” didn’t invest a lot, they invested well.

    8th richest club in the world is pretty good, I’d say

  2. Ba Elkhirsawy says:

    It shows that normally, the club should be competing for 4th, not 8th.

  3. A J says:

    Each team listed in terms of their current league position in their respective leagues.

    1 ) Barca – 3rd

    2) Real Madrid – 2nd

    3) Bayern – 1st

    4) Manchester United – 2nd

    5) Liverpool – 6th

    6) Manchester City – 1st

    7) Chelsea – 5th

    8) Arsenal – 9th

    9) PSG – 2nd

    10) Spuds – 7th

  4. vieralyn says:

    nothing highlights the failure of our business model when it comes to investment/recruitment than the fact that PSG, with their treasure-trove of world-class talent, is below us on this list…of course, the difference is their ownership cares first and foremost about winning at the highest of levels, whereas ours cares ONLY about propping up his financial portfolio while taking on NO monetary risk whatsoever…how terribly sad…from a financial standpoint it wouldn’t matter if our owner was one of the richest Billionaires in the free world or Joe from the bridge, who didn’t have a pot to piss in…this is why the rich get richer, even as the rest of the world burns

Comments are closed

Top Blog Sponsors
JustArsenal Top Ten UK Blogs