Arsenal star’s wife held at airport after police discover her carrying a weapon

Bella Kolasinac was stopped by the police for carrying a stun gun.

The wife of Arsenal left-back Sead Kolasinac reportedly landed herself in trouble with police at an airport as she was found to be carrying a stun gun.

According to the Sun, Bella Kolasinac had bought the weapon to carry on her as protection ever since the trauma of her husband and fellow Gunners ace Mesut Ozil being attacked by thugs on the street last summer.

The report explains that Mrs Kolasinac has a security permit that allows her to carry the stun gun in order to keep herself safe in case of any similar future attacks.

According to the Sun, she sobbed to police as she explained herself, and was eventually let off the hook with a caution after flying in to the UK from Germany.

One can certainly imagine wanting to take extra care to protect yourself after such a scary attack last year, with Kolasinac at the time bravely fighting off the attackers himself, despite them carrying knives.

Tags Sead Kolasinac


  1. SueP says:

    I’m not sure what to make of this story

    I didn’t know that we were allowed permits let alone stun guns for personal protection in the UK. If not then, she got let off lightly. I sympathise with her protection problems but a employ a personal minder instead

  2. Loose Cannon says:

    I fail to understand why so many photographs of her. This is a football website. Thanks for the news, let us not debate, the law enforcement agencies know best what they have to do.Stay safe Mr. &Mrs. Kolasinac.

  3. Dan says:

    So many photos ?
    There are 4 ?
    Be interesting if it were 4 pictures of Kolasniac would you say anything ?

    1. Sue says:

      I would 😍😜

    2. SueP says:

      I noticed that too! Clearly a pretty girl and doesn’t mind sharing herself with her fans.

    3. Loose Cannon says:

      Arsenal have employed Saed Kolasinac, hence I would not mind n number of his pics in Arsenal kits only. Mrs Kolasinac is not on Arsenal roles and we are here to discuss football.

  4. jon fox says:

    Don’t you think it honourable to keep right out of the life of someone who is not even an Arsenal player but “merely” the wife of one and who is bound to be scared, even terrified of that awful event happening again?


    ADMIN PAT COMMENT. JON I will not allow you to attack our writers or articles in that manner.
    I have told you this many times…

    1. jon fox says:

      And PAT I will not allow this site to interfere unnecessarily with the private life of a nonArenalindividual without adverse comment You should take this seriusly Pat, as I have had more than enough of perfectly free and fair comments beingunfairly deleted. I am close ro leaving this site. Very close and I am appalled attwo things; firstly, that you chose to let Marks invasive article be used and secondly that you deleted my fine and very fair comment calling him and you out, rightly so, for invading sensitive privacy. You should rethink or I am off for good. LAST WARNING!

      1. jon fox says:

        You will notice I AM FAR FROM ALONEINTAKING THIS VIEW ON MRS. K’s privacy! A busines that ignores fair comments andfeed back from its regular customers is not a healthy one.

        1. Sue says:

          Jon, this has been over NN for days… and a lot of other places for that matter!! Mark is only reporting what is out there…
          Privacy? No chance, not in the spotlight, plastering everything over Instagram, FB, twitter etc etc….

          1. jon fox says:

            Sue,You have your views and I have mine. Unlike your point of view I do not do what I consider wrong and in this case invasive , simply because others have previously done so. If you choose to follow, sheeplike, then so be it. It is not, never has been and never will be for me. I think independently and always will But then, I am not a sheep! Would younlike your privatebusiness all ove social media without being asked? No? Thouight not ! Then please allow other non Arsenal people the same right. This site is about Arsenal , not the wives and relatives, who are nothing to do with football.

          2. Sue says:

            Firstly, I’m not a wag… surely when you become one, you’re immediately thrust into the spotlight, whether you like it or not. And it probably doesn’t help plastering your whole life on social media for all and sundry to see… which is another thing I do not do.
            I’m not a sheep, oh but then I’m clearly not a ‘realist’ either…🙄
            What else amazes me is the way you speak to Pat/Martin… anyone would think this is your site! If you don’t like it on here, I don’t understand why you keep saying “I’m so close to leaving” yes it’s changed on here, but nobody is forcing you to post a comment, you do that of your own free will! If you don’t like an article, then don’t comment…

  5. Admin Pat says:

    Thank you Sue. Jon is obviously very forthright and that’s okay. But no one is allowed to give direct abuse to any of our writers. As you say if you don’t like it don’t read it and don’t comment. Perhaps his reality is not ALWAYS right…

    1. jon fox says:

      But, surprisingly this time, you have not banned me yet. I still expect it any time, as I am never going to abandon my principles of standing up for what is right and decent for you or anyone else PAT. NOW WE UNDERSTAND EACH OTHER.

      1. Admin Pat says:

        I am not going to ban you. But I’m going to edit any time you unjustly attack anyone at all…

      2. SueP says:

        It is right and proper that you have principles but I urge you to consider in addressing Sue the way you did that it was insensitive. You clearly feel that MrsK should not have had her private life discussed on here and I agree only insofar as it is hardly football related. For many of her type who pose by swimming pools etc, publicity is paramount. I suspect she has enjoyed her five minutes of fame and will no doubt draw in a few more ‘followers’
        If on the other hand she was very much a private person and had been outed as it were then I would support your view that her right to privacy had been violated

  6. Shakir says:

    Sometimes i dont understand media freedom,its not right to intefere in other peoples business let alone their privacy.Like tge country in which i live in the so called ‘media’ is responsible for many losses in life including life…

Comments are closed

Top Blog Sponsors
JustArsenal Top Ten UK Blogs