Raheem Sterling’s loan move to Arsenal, facilitated by his strong connection with Mikel Arteta from their Manchester City days, has yet to bring the desired impact for either the player or the club. Initially, Sterling’s arrival appeared promising, especially given his experience and ability to perform in high-stakes matches. Arsenal even sent Reiss Nelson on loan to Fulham to make room for the England international, indicating they expected him to add depth and versatility to their attacking options.
ADMIN COMMENT
So here are some simple rules which I must insist commenters follow….
You agree not to give any personal abuse to other Arsenal fans. Everyone is allowed to hold their own opinions even if you disagree with them. It COSTS NOTHING TO BE POLITE TO OTHER ARSENAL FANS.
CALLING ALL ARSENAL FANS! Anyone who would like to contribute an Article or Video opinion piece on JustArsenal, please contact us through this link…
It still would go largely unnoticed had Arsenal released Nelson without a replacement.
He hasn’t set the Emirates on fire but class is permanent, he could springs to life any day now.
Cross your heart and tell me,
Is Gabriel better than Eddie Nktheia?
Is Fabio Viera better than Smith Row?
Is Sterling better than Nelson?
Is Zinchenco better than Kieran Tierney?
Is Merino better than Thomas Partey?
Now you know the reason why Arsenal did not score a single goal against Bournemouth, Shaktar and Newcastle? Plan B is not working as there are no game changers on the bench.
The Shoba Reality Show,
Arteta hasn’t got a plan A, let alone a plan B.
sterling got class you must be joking, the other players are reluctant to give sterling the ball unless they have too because they know theres a good chance he will either miss control it, lose the ball or give it away with a bad pass, the players though are confident in giving the ball to thw young nwanatie because he is way above sterling technically