“Cancel football” Sean Dyche gives his opinion on Ola Aina handball

Ola Aina was at the centre of controversy during Nottingham Forest’s Premier League clash with Arsenal after appearing to handle the ball inside the penalty area. Despite a VAR review, the referee decided against awarding a spot kick, a decision that left Arsenal frustrated and feeling hard done by.

Arsenal believed the incident represented a clear penalty and were vocal in their dissatisfaction. From their perspective, the ball made contact with Aina’s arm in a manner that could easily have resulted in a different outcome on another day. The decision has since sparked widespread debate among football supporters, with opinions split across the game.

Arsenal’s frustration over the VAR decision

Many Arsenal fans are convinced the penalty should have been awarded and view the incident as another example of inconsistency in VAR decisions. Situations like this continue to raise questions about interpretation and application, particularly when similar incidents in other matches have resulted in penalties being given.

Arsenal will feel justified in their anger, especially given the fine margins involved at this stage of the season. In matches where chances are limited, moments like these can prove decisive. The belief remains that, in another fixture or under a different interpretation, the decision could easily have gone in their favour. Such outcomes only add to the ongoing debate surrounding trust in officiating and the use of technology.

(Photo by Clive Mason/Getty Images)

Dyche defends Forest’s position

Forest manager Sean Dyche, however, strongly rejected the suggestion that his side were fortunate. He insisted that awarding a penalty for the incident would have been excessive and damaging to the game. Speaking via Sky Sports, Dyche made his feelings clear while also referencing a separate incident involving his own team.

“If these start getting given, we have to leave it. You never know but I think that’s ridiculous. We have to be careful with these. You might as well cancel football if you give that one.

“What about our one? It was right on the line of the box. They’re staying it’s outside but he’s in full flight, going into the box. He’s going to get there.”

Dyche’s comments explore the contrasting viewpoints surrounding the incident. While Arsenal remain convinced they were denied a clear opportunity, Forest believes the officials made the correct call, highlighting once again how subjective such decisions can be.

______________________________________________________________________
ADMIN COMMENT

So here are some simple rules which I must insist commenters follow….

You agree not to give any personal abuse to other Arsenal fans. Everyone is allowed to hold their own opinions even if you disagree with them. It COSTS NOTHING TO BE POLITE TO OTHER ARSENAL FANS.

CALLING ALL ARSENAL FANS! Anyone who would like to contribute an Article or Video opinion piece on JustArsenal, please contact us through this link…

Tags Ola Aina sean dyche

81 Comments

  1. The two incidents cancelled each other out in my opinion, both had their merits for a penalty award and also their doubts, so if not clear cut then neither had enough merit to award pens.

  2. Neither was a penalty,fans blaming Oliver again need to understand it was VAR that deemed ours not a penalty ,not sure how he could have seen the so called handball .

    Looks like some are looking for an excuse was again to deflect what was a p1ss poor performance again ,especially from our front players .

    1. It wasn’t a penalty for them as the foul was on the edge of the penalty box and their player fell in the box.

      As for our penalty claim, it definitely was a penalty. Their player moved his arm to the ball to stop it going out for a corner.

      The ref wasn’t to blame for not awarding us a penalty, the twat in charge of VAR was to blame.

        1. Ahh the usual fans who think because someone made a mistake it’s okay to call him names online

              1. That is out of order.

                I’d never say something on social media that I wouldn’t say to a persons face !

                1. Never said you wouldn’t ?
                  Still sad either way though isn’t it ?
                  The need to call someone a name over something so trivial ?
                  Wherever that’s online or you say it to his face , not behaviour I expect from a grown adult

                  1. Dan,

                    I find that when people start getting personal, it’s a clear sign their losing the argument. So they resort to the cheap name calling.

                    1. Derek, it was clear that the Forest player used his arm to stop the ball going out for a corner.

                  2. Trivial ? Millions of £s at stake and you call it trivial 😂😂.

                    That’s the difference between you and me Still.

                    I call it as it is. I can admit when I make a mistake. You on the other hand can’t/won’t.

                    1. Yes football is trivial compared to real problems in the world
                      It shouldn’t be making a grown man run to his screen to call someone a names
                      It’s really odd behaviour

                    2. You will think I’m biased so ask another adult in your family , at work , at the shops , etc
                      Is it normal to call a stranger a twat ( or worse as you said you would ) online because they are bad at their job
                      It’s odd behaviour

                    3. Herr Drier,

                      While I’m not intending to open old wounds here, believe me I’m not. I just want to understand you with you’re stance of always acknowledging when you’re wrong.

                      With all due respect, do you remember when I sent you a post giving you my condolences on the loss of you’re dear friend/mate. But unfortunately I put what you took offence to by way of a winking emoji.

                      Now my post was sent with the best intentions, and on reading that the emoji had upset you, I did send a post apologizing for this.

                      And to be honest we did have a few to and throws to each other over a period on these posts. But I do wonder if you ever considered that you may have been wrong regards my unintentional offending you with said emoji.

                      Remember Herr Drier, don’t get me wrong I’m not having a go. I just wonder if you will acknowledge that my post wasn’t intentionally offensive.

                    4. It’s not okay to mix up friend and mate but he thinks it’s okay to call a stranger twat ( and worse )
                      Tells you everything lol

                    5. I’ll tell you what is really odd behaviour Still, and that’s writing an article that is just lies…

                    6. What’s that got to do with the topic ,?lol
                      Your the one saying yes its okay to call someone a twat ( and you are the type who says worse and to people’s faces )

                      No one is making you say that and you say it with pride so what’s the issue

                    7. Well it tells the difference between you and me Still. I’ll call a spade a spade while you write and article that told lies. If you can’t see the difference then there’s no hope for you.

                    8. Interesting?
                      So is that something you and your mates do is it.?
                      Call people names online and then abuse them to their faces ?

                    9. Well yeah you and your mates have not verbally called anyone anything on here so why wouldn’t you be on here lol

                    10. Okay posting lol but you certainly wouldn’t be thinking that if you called one of them a coward 😂😂

                    11. Yeah you already said that lol
                      If they hide behind computers screens sending verbal abuse they are cowards
                      Trust me nothing will happen to me

                    12. What they say on SM they would say it to a persons face. Trust me when I tell you that you would be scared#595

                    13. Nothing to be scared about
                      It’s a football blog / site
                      Too deep mate
                      Trust me 100 percent no one is hurting me

                    14. Well yeah your a grown man hiding behind a screen threatening to get other people to hurt me if I were to call them cowards to their face based on the belief that anyone who calls people names online is a coward
                      Do you not think it’s pathetic
                      So trust me ….no one is doing anything to me simply based by the source

                    15. I wouldn’t have to do or say anything if you were to call one of my mates a coward to their face. I would just laugh at you.

              1. Dan,

                Regards you’re Friend and mate comment, I’m not trying to open old wounds with Herr Drier. So please don’t start with the friends v Mates thing again.

                I’ve asked him a question, and hopefully he will give me his response when he’s ready.

                I’m really not having ago at him.

                1. Me neither dude
                  Im just pointing out the irony that it’s okay to call someone a twat ( he would call someone worse and to their face ) but mate / friend is not okay

                    1. What’s that got to do with you thinking it’s okay to verbally abusing strangers because they make a mistake in their jobs ?

                    2. Herr Drier,

                      While I’ve been reading you’re two and throws back and forth with Dan. I’m still yet to see a response to my original post.

                      I would really appreciate a response, even if it just said you don’t wish to answer.

                      Then I would leave it in the past.

              2. Didn’t you call Liverpool fans all sorts of negative things when describing the chaotic scenes in Paris?
                That was online and totally wrong wasn’t it?

                1. No not seeing the link Ken ?
                  I didn’t call anyone names based on getting a decision wrong
                  Why ?
                  Are you saying officials should be abused online if you think they get a decision wrong ?

                  1. No, neither should any football fans should they?
                    You DID call pool fans names mate, check your article.

  3. I believe that Oliver took charge of our game against Tottenham. Didn’t see anyone complaining then. Oh sorry!, silly me we won that game 4-1 didn’t we.

    What am I thinking. 🤦‍♂️

    1. DEREK,
      With all due respect, in one of your recent posts you kind of mentioned previous ref errors which advantaged Arsenal amends itself in the season. Of course we might have been lucky with some but should justice be like some odd professions that require tit for tat. Every game need to be viewed vis a vis its own contexts.

          1. The point is, everyone is talking about bad officiating.
            Some might just talk about their own club, but others talk about bad decisions across the board.
            That’s why the PGMOL keep having to issue apologies.
            Broaden your horizons Dan and Derek and don’t just have tunnel vision when discussing the state of officiating in the PL.

            1. Ken1945,

              While I hear what you’re saying, it makes me laugh when I read all these conspiracy theories.

              Fans of all teams can give evidence on what they perceive as conspiracy acts if they want to.

              I do agree though that some of the officiating is at best a joke, and when you’ve got apologists like Webb continually covering up for their ineptitude instead of getting a grip of them and telling them to shape up or get out, then this is going to be a recurring problem.

    2. Bit difficult to influence a game when one team were completely dominant over the other, wouldn’t you agree Derek?
      Unlike, say, Arsenal leading city115 2-1 at half time and spoiling the spectacle by sending someone off and contradicting what he’d done in the same fixture earlier.

  4. To me the handball is more a penalty than not a penalty.
    But if the referee does not give it, VAR goes onto default settings and backing the referee and looking for the reason to do so and they chose EA bumping into Aina that causes his arm to handle the ball.

    I am not a great lover of VAR and have often argued against it over the years. Let referee make their decisions (right or wrong) and let the game flow (without stoppages) and all of the fans have a moan about it afterwards and the game lives on for a lot longer.

    This is why the 1966 world cup still gets talked about by the Germans and the Lampard goal that we scored against the Germans which was a foot over the line in the world cup (I thin in SA) still lives on.

  5. Our goal at Villa disallowed for handball by VAR after about fifteen minutes was by less of a handball than Forests blatant handball yesterday.

    Rather than VAR taking errors due to subjectivity out the game, it’s introduced a whole new world of slomo freeze frame subjectivity.

    If there was VAR in 1986 for maradonnas hand ball, are we 100% sure VAR refs won’t subjectively decide the arms were raised for natural jumping movement? If they had VAR in 1966 I’m sure we won’t be singing two world wars and one World Cup.

  6. Of course it could have been given as a penalty. It probably shouldn’t but these kind of incidents are often given as penalties in European games.

  7. Yeah, he directly handled the ball. Yes, we should have been awarded a penalty. But we seriously can’t point to that as to why we didn’t come out that game with maximum points. We should take a look at ourselves and acknowledge the fact we have to get back to being our best, especially in attack. Some of our players too reliant on all the good will to make things happen. Just doesn’t put them in good light at this stage of their career.

  8. PENALTY 100%. Even to a naked eye without heavy investment on VAR technology. Yet hid only in the Stockley Park with Darren England being the accomplice.

    1. Ambachew,

      Using words like accomplice, anyone would think you think there’s a conspiracy. 😂

    2. Ambechew, I don’t think you can include match referee Oliver in this, as he was completely unsighted and didn’t make an on field decision. It’s all on VAR Darren England, and for a change Oliver is blameless. I can’t believe I just said that😒.

      1. Jax,

        I’ve just checked you’re last sentence with VAR and yes I can confirm, you really did say that.😂🤣👍

          1. Jax, am I wrong in thinking that Mr Oliver and Mr England are part of the same team of officials for every game?
            If not, for a great percentage of said games?

            1. tbf England didn’t hurt us against villa but did v forest. Oliver wow always tbh. if he was allowed in UCL matches, we wouldn’t be 1st. U heard his wife is also a Ref at wsl and checked she does same against Arsenal. my findings i really can’t tell you

              1. M Oliver didn’t hurt us against Spurs .
                One of our goals should have been not allowed .
                Maybe Spurs should have walked off the pitch in that moment ?

            2. I couldn’t say Ken, I don’t take much notice of the VAR unless we have reason to question them. If they are, it’s a bit dodgy to say the least.

  9. Jax,
    I checked and rest assured you didn’t and can’t say that. Own goal rescinded. What do you make of Sunday’s ref Craig Pawson who reffed us v Sunderland when Timber was bandaged; Merino flattened, Sunderland players celebrated their tackles as wrestlers do? Why did I put a leading question?

  10. Jax,
    I also checked you didn’t and can’t say that. Own goal rescinded. What do you make of Sunday’s ref Craig Pawson who saw Timber bandaged, Merino lying hypnotised and Sunderland players celebrating every tackle in the way wrestlers usually do by upping their two bent arms? Why I put my query leading?

  11. Ambechew, with England being overruled by PGMOL on the penalty decision, who can say what’s going to happen now?

  12. Well as it’s now been found that we should have had a penalty against Forest, I say lets refuse to play United at the weekend.

    If it’s good enough for Senegal, it’s good enough for Arsenal.😂

    But seriously, it does get tiresome how many times Webb and his incompetents, come out after games correcting their wrong decisions. It means absolutely nothing to the wronged sides.

    It makes you wonder what they see that we don’t.

  13. I’ve just read a piece on the BBC page, and it has Webb defending the decision not to send off Dalot against City.

    When you see him defending that, is it any wonder the incompetents below him don’t have any fear of getting even the easiest decisions wrong. 🤦‍♂️

Comments are closed

Top Blog Sponsors