Myles Lewis-Skelly

Chelsea responds to being offered chance to sign Lewis-Skelly

(Photo by Shaun Botterill/Getty Images)

Chelsea are among the clubs reportedly offered the chance to sign Myles Lewis-Skelly this summer, and the Blues have now responded to the opportunity. The defender has attracted interest because of his ability to operate in both midfield and at left back, but Chelsea have decided against pursuing a move at this stage.

Lewis-Skelly was used in midfield for part of last season because of the fierce competition for a place at left back. However, his opportunities in midfield could become even more limited now that Bruno Guimaraes has been added to the Arsenal squad, making regular first-team football more difficult to secure.

Arsenal Consider Summer Sale

Rather than allowing Lewis-Skelly to spend significant time on the bench, Arsenal have reportedly decided that the defender could be sold this summer, particularly if the right offer arrives. He has subsequently been offered to Chelsea and Manchester United, with both clubs possessing a potential need for a player capable of covering midfield and left back.

The opportunity could therefore make sense for either club, especially given Lewis-Skelly’s versatility. However, Chelsea have considered the situation and appear to have concluded that he does not fit their current requirements under Xabi Alonso, despite his ability to provide depth in more than one position.

Chelsea Reject Opportunity

Metro Sport reveals that Chelsea have turned down the chance to sign Lewis-Skelly because he does not have the profile Xabi Alonso is looking for in his wingback. The Spaniard is known for favouring a wingback system rather than relying on traditional full-backs, meaning the defender may not be considered a suitable option for the role.

Alonso is also reportedly not keen on using Lewis-Skelly in midfield, with Chelsea already having more than enough cover in that area. As a result, the Blues have decided not to take advantage of the opportunity to sign the Arsenal defender this summer.

For Lewis-Skelly, the situation leaves his future at Arsenal uncertain as the club considers whether a sale would be the best option. Chelsea’s decision also suggests that his versatility alone is not enough to secure a move, particularly when his profile does not match the tactical requirements of the potential new manager.

_____________________________________________________________________________________________
ADMIN COMMENT

So here are some simple rules which I must insist commenters follow….

You agree not to give any personal abuse to other Arsenal fans. Everyone is allowed to hold their own opinions even if you disagree with them. It COSTS NOTHING TO BE POLITE TO OTHER ARSENAL FANS.

CALLING ALL ARSENAL FANS! Anyone who would like to contribute an Article or Video opinion piece on JustArsenal, don’t hesitate to get in touch with us through this link…

Tags Myles Lewis-Skelly

39 Comments

  1. MlS has a brigth future ahead of him at afc, as did Cesc and now Ife Ibrahim.. cant wait for sunday´s match .
    Counting on Viktor to score 2 goals.

  2. Baffling offering a 19 year old to rivals. Merino and Bruno are into there 30ies and why not send him out on loan. ?

    We are a joke sometimes, no wonder anybody who wants Arsenal players just pay cheap.! Why pay top dollar when you can be offered for far more less?
    All you got to do is show no interest. I thought berta was way smart than that

    1. Can’t the Arsenal fan in London stage a protest regarding this madness? How on earth did Mikel Arteta arrived at the ideal of selling such a talented young player?

      Selling him and Ethan Nwaneri will completely kill the morale of the academy players, that’s sending a message that not matter how hard they work, they have no future with the first team.. Complete madness…

    2. A loan not sales.( especially to rival club(s) will make more sence. This is one of the future of Ars. We should avoid building a team with many aging footballers.

  3. If true what are Arsenal thinking. Zubimendi will be long gone and Lewis Skelly will still be young. And a couple of others will have gone to.

    A very bad decision if this rumour turns out to be true.

  4. This offering Skells is rubbish media story in my opinion. Completely made up on the media’s mischievous thinking Bruno is now blocking Skells game time.

    Chelsea rejected it as manager not interested in the player. 😂. It’s total BS. It doesn’t pass the sniff test at all.

    The reality is the other top clubs covet him as exciting up and coming player whose true potential and versatility at 19 is not remotely known yet. And the “medieval politics” set up in the Chelsea hierarchy are trying it on this week, putting this stuff into the media themselves. Truth we all easy guess.

    The other top clubs covet our great emerging player is the truth.

    As for game time, the line Rice, Bruno and Ode are first choice and play every week just isn’t happening in reality, it’s media myth. To be strong and successful at the end of the season we are looking for rotation from day 1.

    In fact a couple of niggles or proper injuries and we could see a lot of Skelly, merino and Zoob starting 11 midfields – Merino starting right 8 in that set up.

  5. I wish Skelly wouldn’t squander this golden chance to another London outfits in Chelsea. He may regret later if faced with little or no playing time here. He can’t suddenly be the best by playing 3 games in latter parts of the league run. Most Hale End products are in the standards fit only to promoted teams

    1. He won’t go Chelses
      Wouldn’t get in their midfield
      And no before someone says it he’s not as good as Caicedo or Fernandes lol

  6. Selling a player who was influential in some of the CL games is just ridiculous unless you are getting 80M+

  7. Shelley’s Mum and agent has Saudi this is all BS and there is no thoughts about him leaving.

  8. As Jamie O Hara has said, it would be a sackable offence. Silly even considering it. MLS was instrumental in helping Arsenal win the league, transforming the midfield. We were floundering, stupid to even contemplate it. Short sighted!!!!

    1. He started 5 games in the Pem lol

      yet he was instrumental?

      One of those starts was at left back and another was after the title was won ?

      So he actually started 3 Prem games in midfield in the title race yet he ……transformed our midfield ?

      lets all calm down and see how he gets on thank season.

      1. Those 5 games we won???? Before then we had lost to City and Bournemouth and was starting to tread water. And starting to look out of ideas. The change was made and our football from the moment he came on was far better. I am not making it up??? I really do not get your stupid negativity?? Its baseless.

        1. You also forget he played in the win against Athletico Madrid and the drawn 90 minutes game against the best team in Europe? But I just hope he gets the chance to prove himself more.

          1. no I didn’t
            you said

            MLS was instrumental in helping Arsenal win the league, transforming the midfield. We were floundering.

            hence why I’m focusing on the Prem …..
            he started against Fulham and West Ham……that’s it
            other start in the run in was final day when titile was done

            so team were doing okay

        2. well you are making it up , the game before we had beaten Newcastle
          can I ask you respect the rules of the site as I’m not calling you any names
          you have this habit of instead of making your point with football knowledge to just insult me

          what have I said that is negative
          that I don’t think a player who played 3 games in midfield in the title race can be called instrumental?
          I think that’s unfair on Rice and Zubimendi.
          Go look how many games they started

          you can’t just start 3 games at end of title race and ignore August – April
          you have to look at his season as a whole

          1. and actually he didn’t start against Burnley

            he started against Fulham and West Ham and then titile race was done by Palace game

            so come on 2 games as a CM in title race transformed our midfield ?

            do you not think 2 games is very little

        3. well it’s not baseless mate
          After City we beat Newcastle without him starting
          he then played very well in the next 2 Prem games
          and we then beat Burnley when he didn’t start
          so this idea we were lost and he saved the day is ironically baseless

          in a 38 game Prem season you can’t play well in 2 games and be called instrumental

          what a slap in the face to Rice

    1. I like him ( as a midfielder) and praised him last season in the games he started in midfield but need a bigger sample size before I start saying he’s better then the likes of Zubimendi or that I wouldn’t sell him if It meant buying Alvarez or saying he is worth 100 million lol
      he’s young though so let him develop without those comparison

      1. Dan,

        You say let him grow, I agree. But for that to happen he needs game time at Arsenal. We won’t know his potential sitting on the bench will we.

        1. no but that doesn’t mean we can’t call what we see
          he was poor at lb for ages and yet fans defended him
          now after 4 Prem games as a CM he’s better then Zubimendi and worth 100 million?

          lets just calm down that’s all im saying

          put it this way if your allowed to say VJR wouldn’t suit Arsenal then I’m allowed to say I need a bigger sample size on Skelley lol

          1. He wasn’t poor? He got picked for England, he was 18 years old? Not a seasoned pro. He made mistakes but, who in the team hasn’t. I can remember a couple of howlers from Saliba, Calafiori, Zubimendi and Raya. He was 18?????? What a stupid thing to say?

            1. so why was he dropped by England ?
              why did Arteta stop playing him at LB?

              surely if he was not poor our manager would carry on playing him at LB

              you don’t drop a player if they are great ?

              the irony that your saying I’m saying stupid things but your whole argument that he was instrumental in helping Arsenal win the league….is Fulham and West Ham ….that’s literally it ….in 38 games

              that makes him better then Zubimendi?

          2. Totally agree Dan.

            You are entitled you need a bigger sample size. But I’m saying if we sold him, you wouldn’t be able to get that bigger sample size you’re looking for would you.

            Just to say I personally have never said Skelly is better than Zubimendi. Although I have read other poster’s who are of this view.

            1. no but trust me we would be fine with Rice , Bruno and Zubimendi

              I had this with Maitland Niles being better then Kante lol

              1. Aren’t you jumping the gun?
                Skelly isn’t the finished article and I don’t recall who may have said he is. I think he has come on in leaps and bounds and has a bit of attitude without going over the top. I don’t understand why you are so keen to put him in the same bracket (yet) as some of our former academy players who fell short. Too soon imo to be writing him off

                1. I didn’t write him off
                  I simply said he’s not as good as Zubimendi at this time , I don’t value him at 100 million and I don’t think playing well against West Ham and Fulham makes you instrumental in making us champions

                  if you look have not wrote him off at all

                  1. Yeah he can’t displace the senior players you mentioned. Most today’s superstars had gone through the loan out option to develop their skillset including our Wiltshire. Arteta has to worry primarily about today; young players with their agents have to find ways to prepare for tomorrow. Better loan him out than rot on the bench.

                  2. Last season, he was dropped and lost his confidence, any fool could see that. To be fair he was dropped and that impacted more than his Arsenal career. That for a VERY YOUNG KID must have been hard. But he has shown more character that the likes of you give him credit for.

                    1. And yes, you did write him off and take every opportunity to put him down that you can. HE IS NOT 20 YET??? You do not and have never rated him. You do nothing but put him down. Its very strange.

                    2. your tieing
                      yourself in knots dude
                      so was he dropped because he was poor or do you think he was dropped because he was excellent lol ?

                      I gave him credit at the time but starting against Fulham and West Ham can’t be enough to make you better then those who played all season
                      season is August – May
                      you have to consider all of it , not two league games

                    3. I wrote him off as a left back and said he needs to play in midfield
                      manager agrees with me lol

                      not as strange as saying two starts in midfield was instrumental in us becoming champions ?

Comments are closed

Top Blog Sponsors