Jamie Carragher has questioned whether Arsenal possess a genuine attacking superstar as the Gunners continue their pursuit of the Premier League title. Although Arsenal are currently the leading side in England this season, none of their players is viewed as a clear favourite for the Golden Boot or the Player of the Year award.
Their attacking output has largely been shared across the squad, with goals and assists distributed among several players rather than centred on one prolific figure. That collective approach has helped them remain consistent, yet it has also prompted discussion about whether they have the decisive individual quality often associated with champions.
Questions over attacking quality
Arsenal addressed their need for a striker in the summer by signing Viktor Gyokeres, but he has not performed at the level many expected. The forward has struggled to reproduce the form that persuaded the club to bring him in, and he has yet to impose himself in the manner required of a leading striker at a title-challenging side.
The Gunners will hope he improves and begins to provide the return on investment they anticipated. At the same time, scrutiny has extended to other attacking players. Bukayo Saka and Martin Odegaard have been central to Arsenal’s recent progress, contributing creativity and goals. Yet, there remains debate over whether they can be regarded as true superstars capable of carrying a team in decisive moments.
Carragher’s assessment
Carragher offered his perspective on the issue, as reported by the Metro, suggesting that while Arsenal’s mentality is strong, their forward line may lack a standout figure.
He said, ‘People talk about their mentality – I actually think Arsenal have great mentality. But there problem could be a lack of quality in the final third.
‘When I watch Arsenal, I don’t think they’ve got an absolute superstar in the front four or five players. I thought Saka and Odegaard were going to get there a few years ago.
‘I thought they were ready to almost become the best players in the Premier League. I still don’t think Arsenal have got one of them.’
_____________________________________________________________________________________________
ADMIN COMMENT
So here are some simple rules which I must insist commenters follow….
You agree not to give any personal abuse to other Arsenal fans. Everyone is allowed to hold their own opinions even if you disagree with them. It COSTS NOTHING TO BE POLITE TO OTHER ARSENAL FANS.
CALLING ALL ARSENAL FANS! Anyone who would like to contribute an Article or Video opinion piece on JustArsenal, please contact us through this link…
For once Carriages is right with his views and comment.This begs the question though: what really brings success? Tottenham had Harry Kane and Song for years. Man U had Ronaldo (2nd sting) and Martinez, Chelsea has Palmer and Pedro. Man City has Haaland and a whole bunch of good strikers, but all of these teams have not been able to catch up with Arsenal this season.. Arsenal works with what it has, and non of it is poor quality.
I’m have been an Aresenal for 25 years, but I don’t agree with Carragher on the lack of stars. The problem is that Arsenal play way too slow allowing teams to set up their defense to thwart any attacking potential. I see a lot of indecisiveness when players have the ball, standing still and looking around. Ideally players should know where to play the ball even before receiving it, but Aresenal players often misplace passes when ever the try to play fast. I don’t know if this apprehension is because of the way they practice is simply lack of confidence in their technical skills. Another problem that complicates the issue is lack of speed up front, aside from Martinelli and may be Jesus and Madueke, there are no forwards or attacking midfielders that can out run defenders on through balls.
Simply put the inability to move the ball quickly and precisely and lack of speed prevent them from having a consistent goal scorers
What a joke he is. This is a TEAM game. That they have 7 players with 4 or more goals (total 38) is better than City’s 3 players (total 32), despite Haaland. Also Arsenal have a better GD in EPL and were top of CL, unbeaten. Who needs a single individual when a single injury could jeopardise things?
I disagree. Just over a year ago Saka was on course to break the PL assists record before his injury, and for a while, he was the best attacker in the league not named Salah. Like Salah, he’s struggling a bit, but you don’t just lose that star power at 24- he’ll be back. Eze has also shown his superstar status for Palace.
The rest- Havertz,Trossard,Martinelli,Gyokeres,Odegaard and Madueke are very good players- they don’t have to be superstars to contribute.
If we are to win,it will be by committee,with everyone contributing. It doesn’t have to be about individual brilliance.
I think our attack is a bit disjointed at the moment. Our forwards lack chemistry and cohesion but that will come with time. For now, our superstar will have to be set pieces.
Arteta has deliberately built the club where goals are spread out not focused on a single superstar player.
Right or wrong, time will tell. I agree with Carragher about lacking a superstar attacker; we have not had one since Alexis Sanchez. He was the last who could step up and take the game in hand and drive the team to a result.
Unfortunately we do not have an individual like that in our attack. Whether we need one or not, time will tell. So far without one, we have topped out at 2nd and no trophies to show.
Hopefully this year is different; process complete, project finished, and hopefully time to bear fruit.
I agree that Arteta has built the club so that goals are spread out. I also think he has prioritised flexibility throughout rather than relying solely on specialists. Not popular in all quarters but with so many matches and cup competitions to navigate, the frequent injuries (across the league not just Arsenal) require more strings to the bow imo
I don’t think we have a “superstar” attacker – saka is the closest and I think he can be that level, he’s just had too many interruptions with injuries recently (hence the madueke signing) which I think have inhibited him. I do think that will come good eventually.
I don’t think odegaard quite has it in him to be that player, though. Great talent and definitely a very good player, but lacks that killer instinct, and always has.
Overall I do agree with caragher’s assessment – however, while it would be great, I’m not convinced we *need* a de bruyne, salah or haaland to be a great team (we definitely do have a superstar in midfield and arguably several in defensive positions). We could do with a little bit more in attack, though. Another trossard (very good player who *does* have the killer instinct, but is not a superstar) would do wonders for us.
Although it’s nice to have a sprinkling of superstars, it’s a team game. And without the team, the superstar wouldn’t be enough to win enough games would they.
And as the saying goes, there is no I in team.
Speaking of a lack of quality. Why have we another meaningless article from Spit the dog?
As an arsenal fans he is correct if we as arsenal fans accept it or not it’s just a reality, look at how the squad playing because to be honest we are not playing as a team if arsenal was playing like a team we would be looking for the forward give him the ball to score so that he can build his confidence. On the other hand saka is a big drop off all the want to do is score , he can bearly beat 2 players he can’t change a game odegard can only go side way and flare crap..