Like it or not Ødegaard’s long term absence will inevitably affect Saka and White.
Arsenal fans have finally gotten the chance to know the result of the scans conducted on Martin Ødegaard’s ankle recently and it is not good news, in his press conference before the game against Atalanta, Mikel Arteta has confirmed that the Norwegian suffered significant damage to a ligament in his ankles.
The boss wasn’t too keen to put a time scale on the injury, but most of us know that the injury will keep him out for a while, a month and the half at the very least in my opinion, which will see him miss crucial games that could potentially be season defining. We’ve already got off to the best possible start in his absence however, with the win against spurs proving we can handle this loss in the biggest of games.
Nevertheless what has got me worried is how isolated Bukayo Saka became at times in the game against Spurs, without the presence of Ødegaard, the familiar theme of the opposition doubling up on our winger became a tough ask for Saka to deal with all on his own.
This led to some instances where he struggled to beat his man one v one, the little dynamic they have going there between Ødegaard, Saka and White has been the best avenue for chance creation in the Arsenal eleven for a while now, and with Ødegaard now being out for this long, it means that we’ll lack that extra cutting edge their combination brings to the squad. not to talk of a potential dip in the form of Bukayo Saka during this period.
What I also fear the most about this is against the perceived weaker teams, who’ll be happy just to sit deep and frustrate us to play on the counter. That extra creativity needed to unluck those teams will sorely be needed, and given we’ll be without our biggest creative force means we may struggle with those sort of games.
Even though we have a strong defence to bail us out of trouble it may still not be enough given how conceding the odd goal will eventually be inevitable in a game of football.
This will be a big blow to right side but will we be able to cope with this till he’s back ?
KENNETH BENJAMIN.
ADMIN COMMENT
So here are some simple rules which I must insist commenters follow….
You agree not to give any personal abuse to other Arsenal fans. Everyone is allowed to hold their own opinions even if you disagree with them. It COSTS NOTHING TO BE POLITE TO OTHER ARSENAL FANS.
CALLING ALL ARSENAL FANS! Anyone who would like to contribute an Article or Video opinion piece on JustArsenal, please contact us through this link…
I think Trossard can be a better option than playing Havertz in that role. Yes we might lose some physicality in the mid but Havertz cannot work in tight spaces. Plus we don’t have a better option upfront and I would rather have Havertz as striker than Jesus
a lot of people need to step it up. White has been mediocre, Rice still seems like he is on a break and poor Martinelli is just lost. Sadly Odegard is the one position where we really don’t have an type of alternative (Smith Rowe or Viera did not do the job).
The only player who has exceeded my expectations has been Raya as his shot stopping has really jumped.
If we play the same way against City, they will kill us.
I think the amount of games he has played including West ham’s europa conference league victory- its caught up with him.
Obviously Merino was brought in to play in midfield also .. but with him injured, zinchenko (another option) injured and jorginho looking faded last week, rice will have to continue. Hopefully calafiori can adapt quickly as that would allow timber to play midfield .
Being hit with injuries makes it difficult for rotation and when someone like partey starts to feel the pressure and puts in poor performances then it becomes harder. Sooner rather than later arteta will have to incorporate miles into the team as zinchenko and his issues seem to be a problem that makes him un-reliable.
Trossard has to play that role .
Saka maybe less productive , and people will say we shouldn’t have let esr or viera leave ..but the mistake was actually Norway who knew odegaard was carrying a knock from the game against Brighton and proceeded to play him . Complete disregard to the player.
Partey needs to sort himself out as he was largely dreadful against spurs but it worked out and then last just absolutely poor , this isn’t no coincidence. Two years back when we were top of the table we went to liverpool, were 2-0 up only for partey to become lethargic and giving away possession with poor passing. The following game against west ham, he did the same, then at Southampton he was that poor I believe he was subbed and we didn’t see him again .
For an experienced player he seems to be the first who buckles under pressure
The absence of Odegaard will undoubtedly impact on Saka and as a consequence this is an opportune time for Arteta to give our wingers more license to interchange to make us less predictable.I am pretty sure Saka, and indeed the likes of Martinelli and Trossard would welcome more freedom to switch to their natural side of the park from time to time which may give their markers food for thought.You can bet our opponents pre match preparation will devote time to stopping Saka from the right and their game plan may be upset if he started to operate from his natural left flank.We simply do not have a like for like replacement for Odegaard, but from what I have seen Trossard may be the best alternative available to us.
Havertz, Zinchenko and Nwaneri just need a few more games to get used to Odegaard’s role
@Gai Havertz and Nwaneri are our best option playing Odegard role. Zinny can’t press and lacks physicality in the middle. In his last game for Ukraine as a midfielder he was poor losing few midfield battles because he wasn’t combertive. Havertz remains our best option at the moment, with some games Nwaneri will do well. He has a better ball carrying abilities and movement.
Arsenal will have to find a way to cope adequately with his absence or expectations may have to be lowered until he returns.
We’ll just have to wait and see how Arteta reshuffles the cards. An early test for him in Arsenal’s most important season since he joined as coach.
I never in my life dreamed I would say this but where is Zinchenko. We cannot be playing Jesus upfront he’s a liability and it’s like being down to ten men. Havertz must play cf. he defends from the front and offers an outlet for raya. With Havertz upfront I feel a lot safer playing Zinchenko or Nwari in the ten role as the big German is a work horse and will add protect the 10.
Liam
I agree with you on your points. I would rather Havertz remain the striker (he scores & assists at least), and Trossard or Nwaneri in the creative role.
At least Nwaneri COULD surprise us, while Jesus as striker unfortunately will not surprise anyone with his out of position & toothless performances.
Zinchenko would be a better option if that kept Havertz as the striker, anything really except Havertz lessened in the midfield and Jesus as striker.
Jesus simply doesn’t produce and is unreliable with fitness, and should be moved on in the Summer. We can’t afford roster spots taken by unproductive players if we want to compete in all competitions.
It’s not just his passing in the second and third phases that we miss from Odegaard but it is also his running and his duel winning That’s why I think Trossard is a bad alternative Trossard only excels in the last phase usually on the end of stuff Not in the biggest games but I would try Stirling and Nwaneri in that role to get a better idea. It doesn’t sound ideal but we need to find a solution and we miss Havertz up top so it shouldn’t be him even though on paper he sounds like the best alternative for replacing the industrious Odegaard If we had got that striker in the summer then it’d be crystal clear what’d happen
Firstly, I am a big fan of Odegaard, so do not think because of what follows doesn’t mean I don’t rate him or appreciate his importance. However, he has not bossed many games against the top teams, he has often not been effective or just not turned up. We are all talking him up to the point of the ridiculous. We have other players, different players, who have to step up. If we lose to Man City it will be all about the missing Odegaard, but we have lost to them with him in the team. Would I prefer to have Odegaard in the team tomorrow? Absolutely! But I am more concerned about the form of Jesus and Martinelli who can and may play tomorrow. I hope MA goes Havertz up front and Trossard in the hole. I don’t know how much longer we can wait for Martinelli to get better. Hopefully Sterling gets a run on Sunday and shows Martinelli how it’s done. Get well soon Martin.
@JBG5 I agree with you on many front. Truly Matinelli has lacked his goal scoring and dribbling form. But his defensive work rate to support our left full back is the reason Arteta may stick with him against City and in top away matches.
If Jesus had been lethal Havertz would have been the best to replace Odegard. Trossard isn’t combertive enough to play the role not even against City midfielders.
Arsenal have been suffering from a lack creativity for a while now, absence of Odegaard only makes that worse
interesting analysis and stats on Sky Sports today showing Arsenal most clinical in the league on both counter-attack and set-pieces, and actual goals 20% higher than expected goals (better than Haaland, I mean Man C) – so Arsenal are lethal in front of goal, we just are creating enough goal scoring opportunities
this will no change tomorrow without Odegaard
and perhaps points to Arteta continuing with safety first, don’t concede, and hope to nick one
with that in mind I can see Arteta starting Havertz is that safety first midfield role, anyone else is a gamble I don’t think Arteta is prepared to take away to Man C
Jesus is excellent in the press and off the ball, exactly what away to Man C demands, he starts up top against his old team
Jorginho trusted over defensive lapse prone Partey
Martinelli may start too, even though he has dragged down our clinical finishing numbers, but not for the full 90
Sterling, Trossard and Calafiori come on when [hopefully] chasing the winner in the second half
We never should have let ESR go.
ESR is not creative playmaker midfielder like Odegaard, Vieira was actually closer in terms of skill set
i doubt Arteta would have picked ESR for away to Man C anyway so says it all that best for all for ESR to get a game with Fulham