Osimhen v Spurs

Pundit insists Arsenal should have signed European goal machine

(Photo by Ahmad Mora/Getty Images)
Arsenal’s interest in Victor Osimhen last summer highlighted their desire for a powerful, clinical striker, but the move ultimately didn’t materialise, and he instead went on loan from Napoli to Galatasaray. Now, Osimhen is thriving in the Turkish Super Lig, tallying an impressive eight goals in nine appearances and looking poised to help his club contend for the league title. Arsenal’s pursuit of a new striker saw them consider various options, including Slovenian forward Benjamin Šeško, but the focus shifted, leaving both Osimhen and Šeško as missed opportunities.

In the current season, Arsenal has struggled to capitalise on scoring chances in key matches, such as recent fixtures against Inter Milan and Chelsea. The Gunners’ lack of finishing has been a recurring issue, and a player of Osimhen’s calibre could arguably provide the goal-scoring edge they’ve been missing. Former Premier League goalkeeper Mark Schwarzer recently weighed in on this on the Optus Sport Football Podcast, suggesting that Osimhen’s attributes—a “proper old school number nine” with flair, pace, and a natural eye for goal—are exactly what Arsenal needs.

Osimhen on loan from Napoli
(Photo by Francesco Pecoraro/Getty Images)

However, Schwarzer also pointed out the financial challenges involved in such a transfer. He said, “He’s like a proper old school number nine, but flair and pace and eye for goal, and could have had at least four or five against Tottenham. But the issue is, do you pay 120, 130 million Euros? I mean, I suppose they did it with Declan Rice, didn’t they?” This cost factor is especially relevant given Arsenal’s recent investment in Declan Rice, indicating the club is willing to pay for the right player but may face limitations on multiple large transfers.

In Osimhen’s case, there’s an argument that he could transform Arsenal’s attack, but Mikel Arteta’s tactics and style of play may present adaptation challenges. Osimhen’s fit within the Arsenal system would likely depend on the flexibility Arteta allows, and while Osimhen’s prowess is clear, Arsenal’s faith in Arteta’s long-term vision means they might continue to evaluate options. As the January window approaches, the question remains whether Arsenal will revisit this interest or seek alternative solutions to their goal-scoring struggles.


ADMIN COMMENT

So here are some simple rules which I must insist commenters follow….

You agree not to give any personal abuse to other Arsenal fans. Everyone is allowed to hold their own opinions even if you disagree with them. It COSTS NOTHING TO BE POLITE TO OTHER ARSENAL FANS.


CALLING ALL ARSENAL FANS! Anyone who would like to contribute an Article or Video opinion piece on JustArsenal, please contact us through this link

Tags Mark Schwarzer Victor Osimhen

8 Comments

  1. This guy was available on loan if funds were tight but no, we decided to loan a washed up Sterling.

    Thank you Edu (though I suspect that was Mikel’s call)

  2. With all the hype many seem to have for this guy, how come that no big clubs have been queuing up to sign him? He is now on loan on the mighty Turkish league..

    It absolutely does not add up..

    1. The fact that conte said the Georgian winger wasn’t allowed to be sold but he could- in an era where clinical strikers are rare, says it all.
      Osimieh and his agents failed to understand that the top clubs want players who fit there mentality and how there personality fits in to a team. Him and his agent couldn’t keep there mouths shut about moving for the past 2 years.
      Aubameyang did the same throughout his whole career, when dortmund wanted him his attitude changed and made it public he wanted out, at dortmund openly stating he wanted to play for Madrid, barca or psg , none of them approached him, we signed him, look at how that ended. His own behaviour and arrogance was his downfall. Barca gave him a taste of his own medicine when they said he could leave 6 months later. Moving to Chelsea he flopped. Yet everytime he claims he was always the victim.
      Clubs /managers know these type of players are a problem if it doesn’t work out as they won’t show any loyalty and ultimately can’t keep their mouth shut and agent in check.

      1. @ Ad absolute rubbish. The issue with Osimhen is from Laurentis, not the players agent and the players ability. He has thrived in France, he has done so in Italy, and he is doing so in Turkey .
        Please, when you know nothing on a subject, please don’t act like an expert . Napoli refused to let the player go to Saudi Arabia even after agreeing a deal; Chelsea offered Osimhen 1/3 of his current wages and of course he declined. (Osimhen is earning less than Havertz.lol.) Conte only agreed to take Lukaku because Osimhen showed displeasure with the treatment at Apoli after being racial abused by his own club management. Even now Napoli have said they don’t want to sell the player to Galatasaray. By your reasoning why did nobody come for gyokeres or Isak?
        Arteta and his band of merry men have failed woefully in their scout ID; otherwise, they could have gotten the player on loan and we can all see he is miles ahead of Havertz

    2. @ Goonster Laurentis is worse than Daniel Levy; that’s what’s up. Last summer, people didn’t make crazy moves, hence why the likes of ISak, Gyokeres, and yes OSimhen weren’t signed. As you could see, we all signed scrubs in Arsenal with the exception of Callifiori, and the jury is still out on that one.

    3. This why no big club did not go for x and x is very childish argument.

      No big club went for Jesus when we signed him and gave ridiculous wages. No big club went for Odergaard, Gabriel, White, Calafiori, Merino, Timber, Havertz, Raya and Partey when we signed them either.

Comments are closed

Top Blog Sponsors