Was Jonas Eidevall’s decision to rotate his team against Leicester in Arsenal Women’s WSL match on Sunday justified?
Many remember when, against the Foxes, Arsenal needed to execute an incredible comeback last November. Arsenal women turned around a Leicester two-goal lead in the first half to secure a 6-2 victory in the second half. So, on Sunday, Jonas Eidevall’s decision to rest Emily Fox, Kim Little, Manuela Zinsberger, and Mariona Caldentey caught many off guard.
Either way, one might imagine that, with the rotation, he wanted to test the quality and depth of the Arsenal squad as they aim to compete on multiple fronts, including the league and the Champions League.
Unfortunately though, with those changes, our Gunner women didn’t perform at their best. In fact, some contend that the 1-0 victory against Leicester was rather unrefined, with the standout moments being the impressive saves by Daphne van Domselaar and the goal that Leicester inadvertently “gifted us,” which we were fortunate enough to convert.
Three BIG saves 🧤 @DomselaarDaphne pic.twitter.com/IzNejilDvj
— Arsenal Women (@ArsenalWFC) September 30, 2024
Yes, Jonas Eidevall made rotations with good intentions, placing his trust in the players, but what we experienced as fans was truly disappointing. The substitutes, too, proved to be ineffective. While we secured the 3 points, that’s the only positive aspect of the Leicester versus Arsenal match. Indeed, rotation is beneficial, but it shouldn’t involve a complete squad overhaul surely?
What do you think? Were you happy with Arsenal Women’s overall performance on Sunday? I found it all a bit nervy to be honest. I think we could just as easily have walked away with no points and that it was Van Domselaar that saved the day..
Maybe our Gunners were just sluggish due to their heavy schedule of late?
Susan N
Follow JustArsenal’s Gooner Women on Just Gooner Women on Twitter for regular updates on the Arsenal Womens Team!
Do you want to read more about the Arsenal Women’s Team? Click here….
He’s damned if he does. He’s damned if he doesn’t. If you build a squad to compete in 4 competitions you have to explore combinations of players within your squad. After 5 intense games in just
over 3 weeks Kim, Emily, Mariona, Manu , Katie did need to rotate. As it turned out DvD for Manu -success. Wally for Kim- success, Laura for Emily-didnt happen (hope Laura’s absence was just precautionary), Katie looked knackered and Steph’s absence was a problem. We certainly missed Mariona’s influence but what team wouldn’t. An ugly 3 points on the road after the run we’ve been on meant it all worked out. Citeh also “won ugly” at the weekend. Chelski have benefitted by only having 2 games whilst we’ve played 6 . They had to win ugly v Villa and Palace was a jog.
Expectations around our team are high. Some times too high. Qualified for CL and unbeaten in 2 tough league games after the first month of the season certainly meets my expectations.
The plain fact of the matter is with Eidevall at the helm, the Arsenal women will not challenge for the big trophy’s.
Game after game the tempo is so slow, the chances that they do create which is many they miss most of. Some thing which game after game Eidevall mentions in his post match comments.
Well instead of making the same comments, why not make the women work on there finishing better.
And as I said about the tempo, Eidevall just stands on the touch line watching but not doing any thing about it.
I’m afraid unless Arsenal wake up to the fact that Eidevall is not up to the task in hand, the women sadly will not be challenging for the major trophy’s any time soon.