Would it be better to sell Alexis Sanchez to Man United or Chelsea?

Chelsea are claimed to have come in with a late move to sign Alexis Sanchez from Arsenal, but which of the supposed interested parties would be better for us to deal with?

Manchester United and Man City have been the most strongly linked with his capture, but the Blues are believed to have come in with their own offer to snipe their rivals.

The Red Devils are favourites to land the Chilean today according to the bookmakers, and many Gunners fans are livid with the idea of selling to Jose Mourinho’s side for various reasons, including the ongoing spat with the Portuguese chief, as well as the fact that Wenger previously claimed he would never deal with them following the sale of Robin Van Persie a few years back.

For me, selling to Chelsea would be a worse agreement for our side however, seeing as they are most likely the third best team in the division currently, and Alexis would make the gap between the top three and us even larger.

We of course have no reason not to sell Alexis, and maybe we should simply accept the biggest fee, which is what appears to be the idea of the club at present, but I personally think allowing the Blues to increase their attacking threat as a terrible idea.

Should Arsenal avoid selling to Chelsea more than United? Or is Manchester United the worst choice altogether?

Pat J