Posted on September 11, 2015 by ADMIN

Arsenal need a tactical change to thwart Stoke…

Time for a new tactical Approach, don’t you think? by ED

Seriously do Arsenal fans lack about as much creativity as their manager at this moment in time. With the game against stoke slowly coming up on the horizon, the usual “what’s your ideal formation?” conversation has come up as per usual… And I mean everyone is entitled to their own opinions, but… for me there doesn’t seem to be a difference in opinions, the same bog standard 4-2-3-1 (put me to f@cking sleep formation) is the basis to which we turn to time and time again, the only difference is the personnel… and the assumption that they bring tactically a different aspect to the team..

While the answer is yes, let me explain the very reasons as to why it will never work as long as you play 4-2-3-1. First of all the opponents are Stoke City, now I don’t know how much you know about Stoke…. But after living in Stoke, for the last 4 years, and seeing more Stoke vs ‘the top five’ games than I’ve had hot meals in my miserable student life there, there are three key aspects I’ve learned about Stoke… and I am sure most of you would agree; firstly they are physically imposing (they are a big bunch of Mother Lovers, particularly the back 4 and occasional defensive midfielders), Secondly; ridiculously aggressive (Just take a look at their disciplinary record – mostly Charlie Adam’s, and no need to remind you of Ryan Shawcross (yes I’m aware he is out) aka Ramsey’s Leg breaker) thirdly pioneers in ‘Smash and Grab’ football (for as long as I’ve seen Stoke play, they’ve always had a plethora of forwards… who have had just about enough skill and pace to kill you counter attack… this year that quality has gone up significantly Shaqiri, Affelay, Bojan).

So what does it mean against Arsenal… Well remember when I mentioned physically imposing, yeah their shortest defender is 5ft10 (Munesia).. Playing a lone striker in that environment is just about the dumbest thing you could do… he would become isolated very quickly, the threat of an aerial ball against Stoke becomes almost comical, Stoke have height in spades – attempting to beat them in the air sounds just about as stupid as attempting to out pass Barcelona.

Also playing a 4-2-3-1 formation (packing the midfield) against Stoke is simply just playing into their hands. They love to sit back and can dominate the midfield on account of the fact that they are bigger and more aggressive than most teams. People like Sanchez, Ozil and Carzola may not necessarily have the best time trying to evade the physicality of Stoke. Lastly the counter attack, we play with wingbacks, whom whenever teams sit deep against us we send forward, so pretty much all the time. Crystal Palace’s forwards had the capability to irritate Monreal and Bellerin, but didn’t do any damage. Stoke’s forwards are a significant upgrade on them, so if I were Arsene I would be wary of overcommitting, especially with someone like Bellerin whose immaturity (and I mean in terms of experience in the position) could be highlighted very quickly.

The whole point of this article being… Why would you tactically play into a situation that gives the advantage to Stoke? Why not use a formation that exploits their obvious weaknesses; along the wings in the fullback position …. They may be good at attacking there but they sure as hell can’t defend it… and their discipline. For example 4-3-3 concentrate less on playing in the centre and attempting to dominate it as it’s contest Arsenal will win and take advantage of the fact that the full backs haven’t got pace, which normally means the defensive midfielders or center backs often end up doubling up on the wingers… thus clearing a space in the middle and allowing people like Ozil and Giroud to play to the strong points of their game. The point being – by opening up Stoke, forcing defensive midfielders and centre backs into a position whereby they are left chasing these fast players, means that more than often they are left committing fouls.

I hope Wenger sees sense in this game 4-2-3-1 against Stoke is a recipe for disaster…..

Eddie D

Share Button

16 thoughts on “Arsenal need a tactical change to thwart Stoke…

  1. antiwenger

    I agree,but more importantly we need a managerial change to win the league.

    Opinions divided. What do you think? Thumb up 18 Thumb down 17

    1. Fab

      What I’ am worried, people are much concerned with the physical battle, tactically arsenal should not compete with stoke physically, they should lineup a team with high speed and destroy their physical tactic.

      How about this

      Stoke can not stand any chance to the above lineup

      Rate this comment: Thumb up 2 Thumb down 2

  2. Fatboy Gooney

    Nice post Ed…
    It’s a shame that wenger never see’s anything,
    let alone sense!

    I’m Experting alot of boo’s in wenger’s direction at the end of this game.

    Opinions divided. What do you think? Thumb up 8 Thumb down 13

      1. The Analyzer

        Twice you cannot meaningfully express yourself yet you think you know better than wenger.

        Rate this comment: Thumb up 8 Thumb down 7

        1. KickAssFan___ WENGER HAS FINISHED US

          Well, The Analyzer, you too got it grammatically wrong. You do not use the contraction, “cannot”, within the context you used it. You should use the past form of it which is “could”. So, just like Arsene, you think you know it all.

          Rate this comment: Thumb up 7 Thumb down 5

        2. SoOpa AeoN

          yea and that’s why u have nicknamed urself “the Analyzer” cuz u think urself to be an omniscient!……..but fact is…..u remain an artificial intelligentsia

          Rate this comment: Thumb up 1 Thumb down 5

  3. Bosco

    we should play with pace (drop ramsey for Ox or Theo) and quick passing not that slow possession boring football but wenger can’t hear me right now so i’m telling this for myself.

    Rate this comment: Thumb up 10 Thumb down 1

    1. SoOpa AeoN

      who would Let us possess football?……….Stoke??………. Careful how u hold that ball too close and for too Long….. A bully’s always around the corner waiting to do a shawcross!……Take Heed and pLay safe…..BeLoved Arsenal

      Rate this comment: Thumb up 0 Thumb down 4

  4. SoOpa AeoN

    we have become so tactically rigid that the manner with which we approach most games have become overly predictable to even 1st time managers!

    Rate this comment: Thumb up 8 Thumb down 4

    1. YingYang69

      When total football is in sync there is no substitute. No stopping it, just ask Bergkamp Vieira and even T Adams feat Everton. And ask entire Premier League of 2004.

      Rate this comment: Thumb up 4 Thumb down 0

  5. jaweant

    I think we should play Bellerin cause of his speed as well as Gibbs. Gabriel and Kos with Coq in front. I would group Ramsey for outlet passing deep with Coq. Sub him for ArtetA or Flamini after we get lead. Ox on the right with Bellerin will mean aggression and speed. Alexis on the left moving around. I think we need to figure out if we want Cazorla deep paired with Coq or at ten. Ozick could also play ten. OG as striker the best option up front. Campbell could frustrate but hasn’t seen much time.

    Rate this comment: Thumb up 4 Thumb down 1

  6. Mick The Gooner

    Well I just hope there’s actually something to cheer at the Emirates this week. We’ve had nothing so far except the premature celebrations of Ramsey’s ‘offside’ goal.

    Rate this comment: Thumb up 0 Thumb down 0

  7. Robertthegooner

    We need an all out attackj
    I would suggest 3-4-3



    OR My favourite…The Super Duper All out attack formation….2-5-3 formation (not used often)



    Think BIG BIG BIG

    Rate this comment: Thumb up 3 Thumb down 3

  8. summerbreez

    I think we could do well in 443 or 4 1 3 1 1
    As in 34 coquelin
    28 campble 19 carzola 16 ramsey
    17 alexis 12 Giroud
    ozil chamberlain wacott on could bring in walcott and ozil at 50
    just a thought
    Come Arsenal we need a win com on you the Arsenal

    Rate this comment: Thumb up 0 Thumb down 0

Comments are closed.